Taoblog

the other is convinced

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 23:57

 

 

Whenever you demonstrate, you demonstrate your inner poverty. If your taoism becomes a demonstration you are not a taoist. If your meditation becomes a demonstration you are not meditative, because whenever the real exists, it is such a light that there is no need to demonstrate it. When your house is lighted, when there is a flame, you need not go to the neighbors and tell them, "Look, our house has got a lamp." It is there. But when your house is in darkness you try to convince your neighbors that light is there. Convincing them, you try to convince yourself. This is the reason why you want to demonstrate. If the other is convinced, his conviction, her conviction, will help you to be convinced.

This is what Chuang Tzu means when he says: A perfect man is like an empty boat. Many things are implied in it. First, an empty boat is not going anywhere because there is nobody to direct it, nobody to manipulate it, nobody to drive it somewhere. An empty boat is just there, it is not going anywhere. Even if it is moving it is not going anywhere.

A man of Tao said, "The whole world is my home, the sky is my shelter; I go everywhere, there is no barrier. I am a free man."

 

http://video.google.de/videoplay?docid=208438777963459742&ei=S0tmStmCOKGC2wLGyo03&q=

 

 

 

 


you can't find anybody better than a woman to finish your money

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 23:50

Hindus make their sacred places by the side of rivers. Because Hindus have already monopolized the rivers, Jainas had to do something to defeat them -- the same competitive mind is everywhere. So they thought that the best thing would be to choose the highest peaks of the mountains and to show these fools that the rivers are dirty. And people in India even throw dead bodies, half -- burned bodies, dead animals into the rivers. These are their sacred places! So the Jainas made their sacred places on high mountains. Whether I keep you starving or I keep myself starving, it is the same; the same principle and the same standard should be applied: I am a violent man, if not to your body, then to my own body. And in being violent with you, there was a possibility that you may have retaliated -- you may have stopped me being violent to you. But to be violent with your own body is the easiest thing in the world. What can your body do? It cannot retaliate, it cannot prevent you. It has no defense against you. So the person who is violent to others, at least is violent to someone who has the right to defend himself and can be violent in return. But the person who is violent with himself is really cunning, very cunning. He has found the most innocent victim in the world, defenseless. You can do anything you want to your own body. There have been monks who have been beating their body every morning, till the blood starts oozing all over the body. And they were thought to be great saints! There was one Christian saint in Alexandria who remained on a sixty-foot-high pillar -- on top of it there was space enough just to sit. For thirty years he remained sitting on that pillar. He was sleeping there; people were sending food and he was pulling the food up by rope. He was defecating, urinating from the pillar... but this was thought to be great austerity. And from hundreds of miles people would come to pay respect to this madman. He had no other quality, but even kings came to pay respect to him. What was he doing? Just torturing himself.

 

 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=919633178822949889&ei=sm5WSvnwFp-i2wL_9bT1BA&q=
 

 


the idea of health lingers within

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 02:14

 

 

As long as thoughts race within, the thought of No-Thought is also a thought. It is merely a thought that: I am 'Thought-less'. On the one hand there is the movement of thoughts within and on the other; I think I am 'thought-less'. But you can only visualise this state when there are no thoughts within. What is most interesting is the fact that when your mind is in a No-Thought condition, you will not even be aware that there are no thoughts within! To be thought-less is also a thought. It is just like a perfectly healthy man -- he is never conscious of the fact that he is healthy. The consciousness of health is an indication of sickness. Therefore we find that a sick person always talks of health. Such a man is not healthy, he is sick. If sickness persists in some corner, the idea of health lingers within. Many a time this consciousness of health proves to be a new type of illness. If a person becomes too conscious of health, he becomes ill. This is a disease. So it happens that by incessant thinking, by hearing continuously, by regular pondering over it, you develop this expectation of becoming 'Thought-less'. For we have heard that that alone is holy, that alone is the ultimate Bliss, that in itself is the joy of Samadhi, that everything else pales in significance before this supreme bliss. Then this becomes a desire -- the desire to become 'Thought-less'. Remember the 'No-Thought' condition cannot be turned into a desire -- but it invariably becomes so.

 

 http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7308171700962325804&ei=P8DrSaCDNIiQ2AL44pXmCw&q=

 

 

Lachanfall

 


ein US-Sitcom-typischer Vorspann

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 19:29

In der Attila-the-Hun-Show reiten zwei Gruppen von Soldaten auf Pferden – Hunnen und Römer – aufeinander zu und beginnen zu kämpfen. Dann sieht man Attila den Hunnen und seine Frau in Zeitlupe aufeinander zu laufen. Es beginnt ein US-Sitcom-typischer Vorspann der „Attila the Hun Show“, danach sitzen Herr und Frau Hunne mit Sohn Robin und Tochter Jenny. Der farbige Butler Onkel Tom bringt Getränke und erklärt nach einem Blick aus dem Fenster, dass Horden von plündernden Westgoten da seien, Attila zu sehen. Vor diesen wird ein Ansager mit seinem Schreibtisch eingeblendet und sagt wie üblich: „And now for something completely different“. Der „It´s“-Mann startet den Vorspann. Der absurde Gameshow-Sketch „Spot the Brain Cell“, in der eine besonders renitent-tumbe Version der Pepperpots völlig schwachsinnige Antworten auf Fragen wie „Was essen Pinguine?“ („Themselves?“ „Horses?“ „Armchairs?“), tauchte in abgeänderter Variante auch in vielen Live-Shows der Pythons auf. „Cat on Parrot“ ist eine Folge nur für echte Tierfreunde. Erst entdeckt der Rattenfänger Schafe statt Ratten in den Wänden, dann entpuppt sich das Schaf als das wegen bewaffneten Raubüberfalls gesuchte Killerschaf Basil. Dann kündigen Papageien die „News for Parrots“ an, gefolgt von den „News für Gibbons“ und den „News für Wombats“. Aber alles immer noch besser als die Papageien-Version des Charles-Dickens-Klassikers „A Tale of Two Cities“, gespielt mit unerträglichen Piepstimmen.

 

 


Wo man nehmen will, muss man erst richtig geben

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 23:42

Cool

 

Was man zusammendrücken will,

muss sich erst richtig ausdehnen.

Was man schwächen will,

muss erst richtig stark werden.

Was man beseitigen will,

muss sich erst richtig erheben.

Wo man nehmen will,

muss man erst richtig geben.

Dies nennt man:

Klares Erkennen des Verborgenen.

Das Weiche und Schwache bezwingt das Harte und Starke.

Nie darf der Fisch die Wassertiefe verlassen.

Des Landes wirksamste Waffen

Darf man nicht den Menschen zeigen.

http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=3408822685024304278&ei=iKr7SNTJMqKy2gLszKHrDg&q=


It is going down the drain

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 17:19
 
Our whole life is a fooling around. You can do it because you are not aware of how you waste time, how you waste energy -- how life is wasted you are not aware. It is going down the drain. Everything is going down the drain. Only when death comes to you, you may become aware, alert: What have I been doing? What have I done with life? A great opportunity has been lost. What was I doing fooling around? I was not sober. I never reflected upon what I was doing. Life is not just to pass, it is to reach somewhere deep within you. Life is not on the surface, it is not the circumference, it is the center. And you have not reached to the center yet. Sober up! Enough time is already wasted. Be alert and see what you are doing. And what are you doing? Searching for money? It is finally, ultimately useless. It is again a game, the money game. You have more than others, you feel good; others have more than you, you feel bad. It is a game. But what is the meaning of it? What do you gain from it? Even if you have all the money the world contains, at the moment of death you will die as a beggar. So the whole wealth of the world cannot make you rich. Games cannot make you rich. Sober up!
Somebody is after power, prestige, somebody is after sex, and somebody after something else. All is a game. Unless you touch the center of your being all is a game. On the surface only games exist, and on the surface are only waves, and in those waves you will only suffer and drift. You cannot be anchored into your self. This is why taoism has to call, "Sober up!" It is saying, "Don't play games. Enough, you have played enough. Don't be foolish any more. Use life for anchoring, use life to gain roots, use life as an opportunity to reach the divine. You are sitting just outside the temple, sitting just on the steps, playing games, and the ultimate is waiting just behind you. Knock and the door shall be opened unto you..." But you have no time left from the games.
 
http://video.google.com/videoplay?docid=-7953653817285708950&ei=mf2iSJGbIZ-c2gLokb3xBA&q=
 
 

Nicht-indoeuropäische Zeichensysteme

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 23:23

Es gibt komplexere und unserer Kultur sehr fremde Schriftsysteme. Eines davon ist das syllabische Systen, das zwischen sechzig und hundert Zeichen verwendet; jedes dieser Zeichen entspricht einem Vokal oder einem Vokal plus einem Konsonanten, d.h. einer Silbe. Ein wichtiges Beispiel für eine antike Silbenschrift ist die von den Mykenern (1150-1100 v.Chr.) verwendete "Linear-B"-Schrift, die entziffert werden konnte. Bei dem ideographischen, dem logographischen und dem piktographischen Zeichensystem handelt es sich um die drei ältesten Schriftsysteme, die sehr enge Analogien untereinander aufweisen: Die Zeichen sind stilisierte Figuren, die ein Wort, eine Idee oder einen Begriff ausdrücken. Auch die Maya-Sprache der klassischen Periode konnte durch eine Schrift mit Silbencharakter ausgedrückt werden. Die Maya konnten das Wort Jaguar durch das Bild eines Jaguarkopfes schreiben. Auch die altägyptische und die chinesische Schrift drücken sich über diese Systeme aus. Die Anzahl von Zeichen einer ideographischen Schrift kann mehrere Hundert oder sogar mehr als Tausend betragen. Die "Linear-A"-Schrift Kretas aus der minoischen Zeit konnte bisher noch nicht entziffert werden. Es handelt sich um ein unbekanntes Zeichensystem, mit dem eine Sprache ausgedrückt wurde, die weder griechisch noch indoeuropäisch war. Auch die Schrift der Etrusker hat noch nicht all ihre Geheimnisse preisgegeben. Die Buchstaben entstammen zwar dem griechischen Alphabet, wurden aber auf eine nicht-indoeuropäische Sprache angewendet.


drinking water with absolute alertness

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 16:42

Awareness means bringing the mind closer and closer to the body, penetrating the body with awareness. and when it happens, a great thrill passes through the whole body mechanism, and then it is no more a mechanism at all: it becomes an organic unity with the soul. Then the body vibrates in unison. You don't have the division, you don't possess the body; you are the body -- there is no possessor, no possessed. That's where sanity and health and wholeness arise; otherwise everybody remains schizophrenic. So that is going to be your work here: become more and more alert in small things. In drinking water, drink it with absolute alertness, as if everything depends on it. In that moment don't do anything else. Taste the water, feel its coolness going down your throat. Feel the quenching of the thirst, feel the entry of the water in the body. In that moment only be that. Eating, do the same. In walking, sleeping, loving, remember one thing: the body has not to be used as a robot. It is not a machine, you are not the manipulator. It is you; it is your visible being, you are its invisible source. But you are not two, you are two aspects of one energy. Matter and mind are not two but two states of the same energy; matter is more condensed, the mind is more abstract. No time should be lost unnecessarily. Just be alert, because our minds are very accidental. The mind is like driftwood: it has no sense of direction. Unless you remember it you can be hooked into something, you can get involved in something and then the time will be prolonged unnecessarily. It is urgent to come back and to be with me. Keep alert about that urgency. That will help and will not allow the mind to drift anywhere. Stop drifting. Make your work your meditation. Whenever you are with things which grow, you grow. That is the difficulty with machines: they don't grow, so if you work with machines you are stuck. They don't keep the growing energy flowing around you. So people who work with machines, by and by, slowly slowly become mechanical. Machines reduce man to a machine. To be with trees and plants is beautiful because they go on growing, they become an impetus, an inspiration, and the whole energy is flowing upwards with the growth. You cannot remain low, you have to go high. If you are alert, then farming can turn you on as no drug can ever do. Just the smell of the wet earth, the smell of the growing plants, the joy of the birds and the sun -- all that becomes a milieu for spiritual growth. To be close to nature is to be close to god. Even if it is not very economical, even if it is not very paying, don't be worried; that is irrelevant.


That has to be delivered

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 17:16

Traditional Taoism stood on keeping techniques and information secret from outsiders. It should be shared. We should remember the Uncarved Block and keep our minds as open as we can! Let’s see how it turns out:

Everyone is appointed by tao
But we have forgotten completely our mission
We have forgotten even why we are here
We have forgotten the message
That has to be delivered.
We have forgotten who has sent us and we have
Forgotten to whom the message has to be delivered
We have forgotten everything!
We are living in a deep forgetfulness
And we call it life.
And people who are so utterly forgetful,
Of everything
Think themselves intelligent people.
If you ask the awakened ones they will call
This is sheer foolishness.
We have to wake up out of this foolishness,
We are here to fulfil a certain purpose.
Everyone is here to sing a song
To dance a dance, to release a certain perfume
But that is possible only
If you become very very conscious,
That is possible only
If you become so much alert that
You can see yourself directly, not via others.
Right now
Whatsoever you know about yourself is via others:
Somebody says you are very nice
And you believe it. Of course,
Everybody wants to believe that one is nice.
And somebody says you are very intelligent
And you believe it.
There are troublesome people also
Who say you are not intelligent,
You are stupid, you are a fool;
Nobody believes them but
They create a disturbance.
That's why we get angry:
Everything was running so smoothly,
Your father, your mother, your uncle, everybody
Was saying you are so nice, so beautiful,
Then somebody turns up and says that
You are just a fool -- how he annoys you.
And he may be right!
There is far more possibility that he is right
Because the world is full of fools.
But no mother can think that her son is a fool.
She will realize it only but later on when the son
Has fallen in the hands of another woman.
Then she will realize that he was a fool
Because then she will see that
'I have made so much effort and worked hard ...
It took twenty-five years for me
To make him intelligent enough
And here comes another woman
And within five minutes
She make a fool out of the same man!'
But till that happens, she will believe in you
That you are a great hero,
That you are somebody special
Because through your speciality
She becomes unique: Her son is special.
Your father believes that you are great
Because through you he is great.


To whom is it that these (two) things are owing?

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 02:51

Therefore the sage puts his own person last, and yet it is found in
the foremost place; he treats his person as if it were foreign to him,
and yet that person is preserved. Is it not because he has no
personal and private ends, that therefore such ends are realised?

Abstaining from speech marks him who is obeying the spontaneity
of his nature. A violent wind does not last for a whole morning; a
sudden rain does not last for the whole day. To whom is it that these
(two) things are owing? To Heaven and Earth. If Heaven and Earth
cannot make such (spasmodic) actings last long, how much less can man!

The skilful traveller leaves no traces of his wheels or
footsteps; the skilful speaker says nothing that can be found fault
with or blamed; the skilful reckoner uses no tallies; the skilful
closer needs no bolts or bars, while to open what he has shut will be
impossible; the skilful binder uses no strings or knots, while to
unloose what he has bound will be impossible. In the same way the
sage is always skilful at saving men, and so he does not cast away any
man; he is always skilful at saving things, and so he does not cast
away anything. This is called 'Hiding the light of his procedure'.

Words that are strictly true seem to be paradoxical.

This may seem paradoxical: the truly religious person is not religious at all in the ordinary sense of the word. And the religious person in the ordinary sense of the word is not religious at all. One has to be very careful, watchful, because there are many false coins in currency, and the false has to be understood as false, only then can the true be understood as true. Unless you cease clinging to the false you will not be able to receive the truth. So be religious but don't be Christian and don't be Hindu and don't be Mohammedan. No ideology is going to help.

A young boy went out for the first time to the forest near his village. He was very much afraid of and alert against loneliness. Just then, he heard some creeping sound in the bushes. Surely, somebody was secretly following him. He shouted loudly and asked: "Who is there? The hills asked a bit more loudly "who is there?" Now he was fully convinced that some one was hidden. He was afraid even otherwise. His hands and feet started trembling, and his heart started pounding. But to give courage to himself, he told the hiding person: "You coward!". There was the echo: "You coward!" For the last time he collected his nerves and shouted: "I will kill you". The hill and the forests also shouted "I will kill you." Then that boy ran fast towards the village. The echo of his own feet sounded as if the other man was chasing him and now he did not have the courage even to turn back and see. On reaching the door of his house, he fell down unconscious. When he came back to his senses, every thing came to light. On hearing all this his mother laughed loudly and said: "You go there again tomorrow and tell that mysterious person what I tell you. I am fully aware of that person. He is a very nice and loveable man. That boy went there the next day. On reaching, he said: "My friend!' There was the echo of 'My friend! ' This friendly sound consoled him and he said: 'I love you!'. The hills and the forest all repeated; 'I love you!"
Is not the story of the echo the story of our so-called life?


You may have millions of dollars

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 00:19

Do you know, they destroyed the commune of Osho in America and they have said that their priority was to destroy the commune. But why? The commune was not doing any harm to them. The commune was twenty miles away from any American town, and nobody bothered even to go those towns. They were self-sufficient, they were producing their own food, they were producing their own milk products, they were producing everything they needed. And they were not using any money for exchange. If you needed something, the commune would provide it. Money you could donate, but you could not purchase anything. Money would be needed if the commune wanted to purchase something from outside. It was a unique commune, of its own kind. Everybody was equal, for the simple reason that you could not use your money. You may have millions of dollars and somebody may be without a single dollar, but you were both equal as far as being inside the commune was concerned. This was the highest form of communism that has ever happened in the world, and it was not only simple communism. It was also an impossible miracle, it was anarchism. Nobody was governing. It was a great synthesis between two opposing philosophies of communism and anarchism. And as the commune became more and more successful, America became more and more threatened. President Ronald Reagan was a fundamentalist Christian, which is another name for a fanatic Christian. So all the fanatic Christians and Ronald Reagan together destroyed the commune. Who creates terrorism? Because Osho was not a citizen of America, he remained silent. In America -- you can see the stupidity -- they had raised a marble monument in The Dalles, the county seat where Osho´s commune existed, a memorial saying that "We have succeeded in throwing out the enemies; we have succeeded in destroying the commune which was a danger to the nation." But why? And Ronald Regan himself was accepting that Osho had not committed any crime and there was no evidence. And still Osho had been fined four hundred thousand dollars. And Osho didn't have a single rupee. But as Osho had been telling again and again, he trusted existence. Osho loved people. Within ten minutes they managed to collect four hundred thousand dollars. Even the magistrate was surprised, because they were thinking that neither would Osho be able to produce that money nor could he get out of the prison. America´s attorney had accepted publicly that there is no proof against Osho. Then for what was he punished? And the punishment also states that for five years Osho could not enter America. But if he had not committed any crime, then this judge should be punished. America´s judicial process is as corrupted as any. Not only that for five years Osho should not enter America, but a fifteen year suspended jail sentence. That means that if Osho would have entered America there will be no need of any trial -- he would be simply put in jail for fifteen years. And the attorney general of America was a close bosom friend of Ronald Reagan. They had been educated together, they had been in the Hollywood cowboy third-class films together. And as Ronald Reagan became the president, immediately this man was appointed as the highest law authority, the attorney general of America. And if the office of the highest law authority of America said they don't have any evidence that Osho had committed any crime, then for what was he punished?


they are all-knowing

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 18:37

It is a momentum, a gathering momentum. You are standing on the shoulders of the Buddhas -- the whole part is yours. For example, in Osho Buddha is a part, Jesus is a part, Abraham is a part, Krishna is a part, Mohammed is a part... in that way Buddha was poorer than Osho, Jesus was poorer than Osho. And some future enlightened person will be richer than Osho, because Osho will be part of his being but he cannot be part of Osho’s being. Evolution goes on gathering momentum.

Each child should be more intelligent than the parents -- but that brings trouble, because that is what offends the parents. Parents would like to pretend that they are all-knowing. In the past it was easy to pretend because there was no other way to impart knowledge to the children than by the oral communication from the parents.

For example, a carpenter's son would learn all that he would ever learn through the father. The father would not only be the father but the teacher also. And the son would always be in awe and respect of him, because the father knew so much -- he knew everything about all kinds of trees and wood and this and that, and the son knew nothing. He would have tremendous respect.

Age used to be respected: the older a man was in the ancient days, the more wise, of course, because of his experiences. But now we have invented better means of communication. The father is no more the teacher; now the teaching profession is a totally different profession. The child goes to the school. The father had gone to the school thirty or forty years before. In these thirty, forty years there has happened a knowledge explosion. The child will learn something which the father is not aware of, and when the child comes home, how can he feel any awe? -- because he knows more than the father, he is more up to date than the father. The father seems to be out-moded.

This is the problem, and this is going to be so more and more, because our expectations are old and we still want the child to respect the parents as he used to respect them in the past -- but the whole situation has changed. You will have to learn something new now: start respecting the child. Now, the new has to be respected more than the old. Start learning from the child because he knows better than you. When your son comes from the university, he certainly knows better than you.

The new generations are not really a problem: your expectation that they should respect you, that they should respect you as children have always respected their parents -- it is impossible.


Nothing wrong in it

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 22:56

Fresno, visiting San Francisco, got quite a thrill out of attending a daring party in the Bohemia known as Telegraph Hill.

A friend who was showing her the sights pointed out a familiar-looking young couple and whispered, "Don't look now, but those two artists there are living in sin."

"Sin, my foot!" exclaimed the Fresno lady. "I know them. It is just Lois and Maurice, and they were married in the Fresno Baptist Church five years ago."

The young couple overheard and quickly drew the Fresno lady aside. "For God's sake don't tell anybody we are married," said the young man in a tense undertone. "It would ruin our artistic reputation."

Pornography is a by-product of religious repression. The whole credit goes to the priests. Pornography has nothing to do with pornographers. The pornography is created, managed by the Church, by the religious people. In a primitive, natural state, man is not pornographic. When human beings are naked and nude and man knows the woman's body and woman knows the man's body, you cannot sell PLAYBOY. It is impossible. Who will purchase PLAYBOY? And who will look into all that crap? They have repressed so much that man's mind is boiling. The man wants to see the woman's body. Nothing wrong in it, a simple desire, a human desire. And the woman wants to know the man's body. A simple desire, nothing wrong about it. Just think of a world where trees are covered with clothes. There are people.... There are some English ladies who cover their dogs and cats with clothes. Just think, cows and horses and dogs dressed. Then you will find new pornography arising. Somebody will publish a nude picture of a tree -- and you will hide it in a Bible and look at it! This whole foolishness is out of religious repression. Make man free, allow people to be nude. I am not saying they should continuously be nude, but nudity should be accepted. On the beach, at the swimming pool, in the home... nudity should be accepted. The children should take a bath with the mother, with the father, in the bathroom. There is no need for the father to lock the bathroom when he goes in. The children can come and have a talk and chitchat and go out. Pornography will disappear. Each child wants to know. "How does my daddy look?" Each child wants to know, "How does my mother look?" And this is simply intelligence, curiosity. And the child cannot know what the mother looks like, and the child cannot know what the father looks like; now you are creating illness in the child's mind. It is you, you are ill, and the illness will be reflected in the child's mind.


A FINE TEMPLE

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 23:11

Shen Tsan was giving a bath to his old teacher. Rubbing his back, he said: "This is such a fine temple..." Every body is a fine temple, according to Zen. Every body is a shrine of Tao; Tao is enshrined in everyone. You need not go anywhere else to find Tao; if you can find yourself you have found Tao. It is hiding within you -- it is your within. "THIS IS SUCH A FINE TEMPLE," SHEN TSAN SAID, "BUT THE BUDDHA IN IT IS NOT AT ALL HOLY!" Maybe the old teacher was taking a bath and also reciting a sutra. That's what Buddhist monks do; they will go on taking a bath and reciting a sutra. Hindu pundits do the same, Hindu sannyasins do the same. They will go to take a dip in the Ganges and they will recite gayatri and other mantras. They are divided! If you want to recite gayatri, recite gayatri -- forget about taking a bath. And when you are taking a bath, take the bath, forget about gayatri. Then let this bath be your only mantra. He must have been reciting some mantra because they think, "Why waste time? You can do both the things." They will go on eating and they will go on reciting inside a certain sacred mantra. Why waste time? But then you are missing the totality of eating, then you do not taste your food. How can you do it? The mind is capable of doing only one thing at a time; it cannot do two things together -- it is impossible. If you are eating, then let your whole consciousness be that of taste, of smell. Forget everything! Then even ordinary bread may taste like the most delicious food possible. But you are not present. Look at people eating -- they are talking, there are people who are listening to the radio or seeing to the TV. I have heard about stupid Americans even making love while seeing the TV! -- what to say about eating? Why miss? You can do both the things -- you can make love and you can go on seeing the TV. Now, neither you will be seeing the TV nor you will be making love; you will not be able to enjoy either, you will miss both. There are people who cannot eat if they don't have company to talk and gossip and to discuss. When you are talking you go on swallowing -- swallowing is not eating. Eating should be meditative, prayerful. You should be more respectful to food because it is life, it is nourishment. And then thousand and one problems arise out of it. Because while you are eating you are reading the newspaper or quarrelling with the wife or listening to the radio or looking at the TV or talking to a friend or holding the phone, you will miss the joy of eating. You will eat more because your taste buds will not feel fulfilled and contented. Then you will gather unnecessary fat in the body. Then one has to start dieting, fasting, naturopathy and all kinds of nonsense follow. But the simple thing that should have been done in the first place was: just eating and not doing anything else.


Whatever the scriptures say means nothing

Allgemein — geschrieben von tao @ 19:53

Nadir shah heard about a great wise man in India, and he asked him to come. The wise man said, "To come to you will be enough proof that I am not wise, so the thing will be useless. You will have to come to the well." Nadir shah felt intrigued and excited too. He had never seen anybody disobey him. This man must have some guts. He went to the man and he felt some strange aura and energy around him. He said, "I have come. I want to ask you: it is said in the scriptures that to sleep too much is bad, but I love to sleep. In fact, I drink too much, and then to get up becomes difficult. The hangover... and then it is better to have more to drink and go to sleep again. What is your suggestion? Should I stop it?" The old man said, "No. Whatever the scriptures say means nothing. They were not written for you. They had no idea that a man like you will take instructions from the books. I would suggest you should sleep twenty-four hours, you should sleep forever. There is no need to wake up." Nadir shah said, "This is strange advice. Twenty-four hours? Forever?" The old man said, "Yes. Although it is against all the scriptures, but I say on my own authority that people like you need twenty-four hours of sleep, because whenever you are awake you will do some mischief. Asleep, much violence, much war, much trouble to the world will be stopped." So there is not much wrong.

All enlightened people have to lie, because truth cannot be said to you. You won't understand it; you are fast asleep, snoring. Truth cannot be said in language. The moment you put the experience of truth in language, it becomes untrue. So, rather than distorting the truth and making it untrue, it is far better to create a device -- which is a lie. But it works!

When love calls you, listen to it. That's the only responsibility. When love says something to you, let it enter into the deepest core of your being. When love knocks on your door, open the door. The real beloved, in fact, does not close the door at all, but waits at the door for the lover to come, so that he need not even knock.

Taoism is a love affair. It has nothing to do with ruled and the rulers, leaders and the led. It has certainly to do with love and lovers. And the beauty of love is: it does not create hierarchy.

You have every capacity, ability, potentiality to be enlightened. It is just a question of your decision. At the most, love persuades. And love has many ways to persuade. It is only hate that imposes. Just look at silence, and we all have become one. All divisions are lost and there is an immense peace, a tremendous feeling of joy arising in you.


Powered by kulando